There were not one but two front-page human-interest stories in Friday's Arizona Republic (apparently this sort of article is what passes for hard news over there these days) which described in detail all of the, you know, inconvenience that SB 1070 is causing all of the illegal aliens residing in this state, and how a significant percentage of them are preemptively leaving before the law becomes effective, which was kind of the point all along.
Infuriatingly, some of the undocumented people profiled in the first of the articles were actually willing to give their full names as well as list where their children go to school, almost as if they were publicly flaunting their illegal status one more time before hitting the road:
“'We are a sanctuary city and we welcome all people to Santa Fe,' said Keith Toler, executive director of the Santa Fe Convention and Visitors Bureau."
Good luck with your smug policy, Keith. Once your liberal residents, who think they're doing something positive for their city (and egos) get a taste of the kinds of issues Phoenix and Los Angeles have been dealing with for decades, they'll change your tune for you in a hurry, of that we're positive.
Then, of course, in the second article in Friday's Republic all of us hate-filled racist peasants get enlightened as to just why one illegal couple decided to both break our laws as well as butt in front of millions of other people waiting to get here the right way:
"Juan and Maria are aware of the irony of their decision. They moved to this country, in part, so their children could have a better life."
Funny thing, that reason. Turns out those wonderful children for whom the couple just had to break our laws to benefit were formerly imaginary kids they didn't have when they arrived here fifteen years ago:
"Francisco, 12, his older brother and younger sister were born in Phoenix."
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Doug-
I really struggle with my views on illegal immigration. I personally have known several "illegals" and in my particular case, they are poster children for the compassionate "amnesty" point of view. Also, I do hear, when listening face to face to some of my American friends, more than a tiny bit of racism and denigration of folks just because of their race and national origin. And it *does* disturb me.
That being said... I know from your voluminous writings that you are definitely *not* a racist, and you have been making a point by point case for weeks that is swaying my viewpoint. I'm not totally where you are (maybe never will be) on this issue, but....
Thank you for the last paragraph you wrote in your post. It was, for me, a compelling point, and may have moved me a bit on the spectrum in your direction.
I worked years ago for several weeks with an American missionary in Mexico, and got to know many Mexican people personally. Your point about "the hardest-working, bravest and most resourceful" leaving the country by any means (most illegally) is true. I had some Mexican friends who felt that was a huge problem in their country, and felt that they had an obligation to stay and work for change from within.
I had forgotten that, and you reminded me. God bless the many wonderful Mexican citizens who are trying so hard to improve their country. Your point was (as it often is) "on point."
Post a Comment