Monday, November 01, 2010

A concrete example of just why everyone needs to vote out Obama's enablers in Congress tomorrow

Kelly Marshall is a 32-year-old parasite woman who lives in Great Britain.  She has 5 children by 4 different fathers and has never worked a day in her life, yet she favors Armani outfits and her spacious four-bedroom home contains multiple flat-screen televisions, three laptops, an Xbox, a Wii and a Playstation 3.

Marshall has also taken her brood on two international vacations to exotic destinations this year alone, and has now come under withering fire since it's been reported that she recently (and apparently quite legally) diverted $7200 of her welfare checks to pay for a boob job, all because she "deserve[s] it because [she is] a good mum".

Well, that argument's certainly debatable.

Oh, and Marshall also has upcoming plans to get liposuction, Botox and a tummy tuck, now that the birth of her fifth child has increased her welfare check enough for her to afford the procedures.

Angry yet?  Think about the British taxpayers, most of whom don't make as much in salary as this brood mare does in welfare, who have to subsidize all of this nonsense.

By the way, does anyone think Marshall has an ounce of shame over her story being made public?  Actually, it's the exact opposite - she's proud of her status as a poster child for officially-sanctioned thievery:

"'I don't care that it is at the taxpayers' cost,' she told Closer magazine. 'I am just proud of my looks and family - and it's my decision what the money is spent on.'"

This drain on society has been able to "accomplish" all of this in her young existence because the Nanny-state that Britain has sadly turned into decided awhile ago that housing, food, medical and child-care expenses are all "rights" that a person is fully entitled to receive merely because they happen to be breathing.

This infuriating scenario, of course, is a stark illustration of the natural endpoint of the kinds of programs that our own Dear Leader, President Obama, wishes to foist upon the law-abiding and taxpaying citizens of America as part of his "transformation" of our society from one of capitalism and self-reliance into one of big government and dependence on the Great Father in Washington for one's daily existence.

Please go to the polls tomorrow to begin the process of reversing the damage he and the liberals in Congress have already done to this country.  It's not too late to halt his attempt to remake the United States into the kind of socialist-lite Nanny-state that enables vampires like Marshall to continue to enjoy an unearned comfortable existence at the expense of her neighbors, all without a trace of shame or embarrassment.


Anonymous said...

Quite a reach to use the UK story to condemn the US president. For one thing, US welfare doesn't work like that. Also, President Obama has never said that getting more people on welfare is his goal -- quite the opposite, in fact. Your logic is ridiculous.

Douglas Hester said...

You're absolutely correct, Anonymous. US welfare indeed "doesn't work like that". Yet.

I stand by my assertion, however, that it eventually would "work like that" if Obama's grandiose cradle-to-grave plans come to fruition. Many others in America seem to agree with me, judging by the voter turnout today.

President Obama's wish is absolutely to get as many people as possible dependent on Federal government largesse, which is indeed a form of welfare. My logic is therefore not so ridiculous after all.

Douglas Hester said...

Actually, Anonymous, here's a photo from a recent rally right here in Arizona that illustrates the fact that that particular moocher mindset is indeed alive and well right here in the U.S.

Bike Bubba said...

For what it's worth, Obamacare undid a lot of the good done by the welfare reform act of the 1990s, and Obama is also a relentless advocate of more unemployment pay, more subsidies for medical care....

....if it's not stopped, it's going to be like England, or France, or Sweden.

Anonymous said...

"Grandiose cradle-to-grave plans"? Can you give a credible reference to such plans? You cannot. You can only point to Limbaugh, Haniity, Beck, and various Republican congressmen who try to read minds and fail miserably. He has stated that he wants people to work.

The health care law DOESN'T DO ANYTHING to the welfare law changes. It simply requires all citizens to get health insurance, provides ways for citizens to get health care insurance, and prohibits such shameful practices as dropping coverage for people that have large claims and refusal to cover existing conditions. These are not more subsidies for medical care. It's funny that the insurers backed him on the bill, then turned against him.

Also, what does unemployment have to do with that? When the Republican-caused recession and Republican-backed moving of jobs overseas put millions of people out of work, what was he supposed to do? Let them starve? That is Republican politics at its most repugnant peak.

Also, what does an idiot's sign have to do with Obama? If we take that into account, all "tea partiers" (and by extension, all Republicans) are racist, violent, blood-thirsty jackasses.